Background Check Blindspots? The Power of Screening with Aliases

Do you include a candidate’s aliases when conducting background checks? If not, you could be missing information to consider when making hiring decisions. Without incorporating aliases into background screening, searches may return less information, which could impact your organization depending on your risk and compliance needs. Here’s how aliases can affect your background screenings and why using aliases may be essential to get the full picture of a candidate’s background. 

While the term “alias” may convey the cloak-and-dagger aura of a spy movie, aliases aren’t confined to the world of espionage. Plenty of people have aliases—one in three to be exact–including many of your prospective candidates. An alias (sometimes called “also known as,” or “aka”) is any variation of a candidate's current legal name or a different name that's associated with the candidate, such as nicknames.

Other common aliases are maiden names, hyphenated names, suffixes, or shortened names. For example:

Using aliases can help background checks to return additional results. When an individual is convicted of a crime, the name they are processed under is usually what is reflected in the Public Record Index. Court records typically do not include all the names an individual has used throughout their lifetime, nor do most courts update records retroactively if someone changes their name after being convicted of a crime.

For example, the candidate named Mia Jones who has gone by the nickname Mia since she was a child may list Mia Jones as her name when providing consent and her personally identifying information for a background check. When the background check company uses the provided name of Mia Jones to search for criminal records, however, it likely will not return records associated with the candidate’s legal name of Maria Jones. Therefore, if she was convicted of a crime and the court records reflect Maria Jones, the background check may not return such results.

It’s a common myth that screening providers search aliases by default. The standard practice for background check companies, when aliases are not used, is to search the individual’s provided or current name. However, if a candidate provides a nickname or a name that was recently changed (for example, a married name), it’s possible that no records associated with an alias will be returned.

In addition, some courts require exact name matching for a record to be returned. In this case, using the first letter of a candidate’s first name and their last name to conduct a background check would not return a record. Using Maria Jones (who goes by the nickname Mia) as an example, searching “M” as the first name plus Jones would not return records for Mia Jones or for Maria Jones.

Including aliases in your background screening process helps to provide a more comprehensive background check, which can mitigate risk and enhance the trust and safety of employees and customers. In fact, including aliases can help you find up to 27% more records.

Aliases can inform many searches for more comprehensive results, such as federal, national, state, and county criminal records searches; civil court records searches; global watchlist searches; and searches of sex offender registries.

Aliases are especially beneficial in highly specialized or regulated industries, such as healthcare, finance, or real estate. When employers need to verify professional licenses, education, training, and other qualifications, having comprehensive checks can help mitigate the risk of regulatory sanctions, fines and penalties, or legal liability. 

For example, if a candidate for a nursing job doesn’t provide their full legal name, healthcare sanctions checks may not reveal that they have been sanctioned by a disciplinary authority. Of equal importance is when running rechecks on employees. If the individual has recently changed their name (such as a maiden name), but you do not include aliases, their name may not be listed in the sanctions database. Not utilizing comprehensive information could put patients at risk and cost your organization eligibility for state and federal funding.  

Checkr makes it simple to include aliases when you conduct background checks. You can add aliases when you order a background check, and when you create or save a package from the Checkr Dashboard. Checkr identifies and searches for aliases for each package by default.

To ensure the most comprehensive results possible, Checkr adds aliases by default when you order new background checks through your dashboard. If you don’t want to include aliases, you can opt out.

You can request aliases directly from the candidate by asking for previous names or name variations on job applications or when obtaining consent for background checks. Aliases may also be found using an SSN Trace, motor vehicle records, and previous names from background check reports that Checkr has provided for the candidate in the past.

Most of Checkr’s criminal background screening packages include an SSN Trace, which reports other names associated with an individual’s Social Security number. This makes it easy to inform further searches should they be necessary. 

Adding aliases to your background screening process is simple when you partner with Checkr. Mitigate risk and request comprehensive results by utilizing aliases to conduct a thorough screening under other names a candidate may have used. Checkr provides complete, accurate results without negatively impacting turnaround time, helping you hire efficiently and confidently.

Are you a Checkr customer? Get the most comprehensive reports by adding aliases now. 

New to Checkr? Get started.

The resources and information provided here are for educational and informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. Always consult your own counsel for up-to-date legal advice and guidance related to your practices, needs, and compliance with applicable laws.